Re: [PATCH 00/20] MODULE_LICENSE removals, fifth tranche

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 01:01:55PM +0000, Nick Alcock wrote:
> This series, based on current modules-next, is part of a treewide cleanup
> suggested by Luis Chamberlain, to remove the LICENSE_MODULE usage from
> files/objects that are not tristate.  Due to recent changes to kbuild, these
> uses are now problematic.  See the commit logs for more details.

Why isn't kbuild fixed instead?  These files can have MODULE_AUTHOR()
and other macros when built into the kernel, what is so special about
MODULE_LICENSE() that prevents this from working properly?

There should not be a need to remove these markings in my opinion, why
treat one MODULE_* macro more special than others?

thanks,

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux