RE: [PATCH v7 2/5] clocksource/drivers: Add Renesas RZ/G2L MTU3a core driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Geert,

Thanks for the feedback.

> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/5] clocksource/drivers: Add Renesas RZ/G2L MTU3a
> core driver
> 
> Hi Biju,
> 
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 6:00 PM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > The RZ/G2L multi-function timer pulse unit 3 (MTU3a) is embedded in
> > the Renesas RZ/G2L family SoCs. It consists of eight 16-bit timer
> > channels and one 32-bit timer channel. It supports the following
> > functions
> >  - Counter
> >  - Timer
> >  - PWM
> >
> > The 8/16/32 bit registers are mixed in each channel.
> >
> > Add MTU3a core driver for RZ/G2L SoC. The core driver shares the clk
> > and channel register access for the other child devices like Counter,
> > PWM, Clock Source, and Clock event.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > v6->v7:
> >  * Added channel specific mutex to avoid races between child devices
> >    (for eg: pwm and counter)
> >  * Added rz_mtu3_shared_reg_update_bit() to update bit.
> 
> Thanks for the update!
> 
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/rz-mtu3.c
> 
> > +void rz_mtu3_shared_reg_update_bit(struct rz_mtu3_channel *ch, u16 off,
> > +                                  u16 pos, u8 val) {
> > +       unsigned long tmdr;
> > +
> > +       tmdr = rz_mtu3_shared_reg_read(ch, off);
> > +       __assign_bit(pos, &tmdr, !!val);
> > +       rz_mtu3_shared_reg_write(ch, off, tmdr);
> 
> As this is RMW on a shared register, probably this needs locking, here or
> in the callers?

OK will add locking here.

> 
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rz_mtu3_shared_reg_update_bit);
> 
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/clocksource/rz-mtu3.h
> 
> > +enum rz_mtu3_functions {
> > +       RZ_MTU3_NORMAL,
> 
> IIRC, this state means the channel is idle?
> RZ_MTU3_IDLE?
> 
> > +       RZ_MTU3_16BIT_PHASE_COUNTING,
> > +       RZ_MTU3_32BIT_PHASE_COUNTING,
> > +       RZ_MTU3_PWM_MODE_1,
> 
> Do you need to know the actual function, or is it sufficient to just know
> if the channel is busy? ...

Actually not required. Channel busy is enough.

> 
> > +};
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * struct rz_mtu3_channel - MTU3 channel private data
> > + *
> > + * @dev: device handle
> > + * @index: channel index
> > + * @base: channel base address
> > + * @lock: Lock to protect channel function
> > + * @function: channel function
> > + */
> > +struct rz_mtu3_channel {
> > +       struct device *dev;
> > +       unsigned int index;
> > +       void __iomem *base;
> > +       struct mutex lock; /* Protect channel function */
> > +       enum rz_mtu3_functions function;
> 
> ... so perhaps a simple busy flag is sufficient?
> 
> Regardless, to avoid replicating the channel function in every subdriver,
> I would add a simple API (can be inline) to request and release a channel.

Agreed, it will simplifies a lot.

Cheers,
Biju

> 
> > +};
> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
> 
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-
> m68k.org
> 
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker.
> But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something
> like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux