On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 11:21:18PM -0800, Colin Foster wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 05:27:59PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 02:47:28PM -0800, Colin Foster wrote: > > > Explicitly allow additional properties for both the ethernet-port and > > > ethernet-ports properties. This specifically will allow the qca8k.yaml > > > binding to use shared properties. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > > > > v2 -> v3 > > > * No change > > > > > > v1 -> v2 > > > * New patch > > > > > > --- > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/dsa.yaml | 4 +++- > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/dsa.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/dsa.yaml > > > index bd1f0f7c14a8..87475c2ab092 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/dsa.yaml > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/dsa.yaml > > > @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ patternProperties: > > > '#size-cells': > > > const: 0 > > > > > > + additionalProperties: true > > > + > > > > Where then do we restrict adding properties to ethernet-ports nodes? > > > > > patternProperties: > > > "^(ethernet-)?port@[0-9]+$": > > > type: object > > > @@ -45,7 +47,7 @@ patternProperties: > > > > > > $ref: dsa-port.yaml# > > > > > > - unevaluatedProperties: false > > > + unevaluatedProperties: true > > > > Same question for ethernet-port nodes. > > For ethernet-port nodes, the qca8k has unevaluatedProperties: false. But > the fact that you're asking this question means I probably misunderstood > something... The above is the case where you aren't adding extra properties (IIRC), so 'unevaluatedProperties: false' should be correct. 'unevaluatedProperties: true' is never correct in bindings. If you ref a schema that sets it to true, you can't override it. So qca8k, should reference dsa-port.yaml, define its extra properties and set 'unevaluatedProperties: false'. > For the ethernet-ports node, I'm curious if my other follow-up answers > that question where I realized dsa.yaml should, under the base > definition, have additionalPrpoerties: false. But again, my guess is > that isn't the case. That one looks correct. Rob
