Re: [RFC PATCH] clocksource/drivers/sh_cmt: access registers according to spec

To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] clocksource/drivers/sh_cmt: access registers according to spec
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 09:30:02 +0100
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAMuHMdUynqKtPF4fBP-Wo6K2++1cStDzgTQ6gBmcKsTHmKbhZw@mail.gmail.com>
Mail-followup-to: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20221116202110.1770-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <CAMuHMdUVmapwN_OHpn4RtQebZCbEi3avka+2MuWpCk59g5UyLA@mail.gmail.com> <Y3c0lpl8zzKMnRPO@ninjato> <CAMuHMdUynqKtPF4fBP-Wo6K2++1cStDzgTQ6gBmcKsTHmKbhZw@mail.gmail.com>

> "2000000UL / rate + 1" is not guaranteed to be a multiple of two?

Right, I missed the '+ 1'

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC PATCH] clocksource/drivers/sh_cmt: access registers according to spec
  - From: Geert Uytterhoeven

References:
- [RFC PATCH] clocksource/drivers/sh_cmt: access registers according to spec
  - From: Wolfram Sang
- Re: [RFC PATCH] clocksource/drivers/sh_cmt: access registers according to spec
  - From: Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: [RFC PATCH] clocksource/drivers/sh_cmt: access registers according to spec
  - From: Wolfram Sang
- Re: [RFC PATCH] clocksource/drivers/sh_cmt: access registers according to spec
  - From: Geert Uytterhoeven