On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 5:50 PM Fabrizio Castro
<fabrizio.castro.jz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The preferred form for Renesas' compatible strings is:
> "<vendor>,<family>-<module>"
>
> Somehow the compatible string for the r9a09g011 I2C IP was upstreamed
> as renesas,i2c-r9a09g011 instead of renesas,r9a09g011-i2c, which
> is really confusing, especially considering the generic fallback
> is renesas,rzv2m-i2c.
>
> The first user of renesas,i2c-r9a09g011 in the kernel is not yet in
> a kernel release, it will be in v6.1, therefore it can still be
> fixed in v6.1.
> Even if we don't fix it before v6.2, I don't think there is any
> harm in making such a change.
>
> s/renesas,i2c-r9a09g011/renesas,r9a09g011-i2c/g for consistency.
>
> Fixes: 54ac6794df9d ("arm64: dts: renesas: r9a09g011: Add i2c nodes")
> Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> v2 - Improved changelog, as suggested by Geert and Krzysztof
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
i.e. will queue in renesas-devel for v6.2.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
