RE: [PATCH] can: rcar_canfd: rcar_canfd_handle_global_receive(): fix IRQ storm on global FIFO receive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Pavel,

Thanks for the feedback.

> Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: rcar_canfd:
> rcar_canfd_handle_global_receive(): fix IRQ storm on global FIFO
> receive
> 
> Hi!
> 
> > Fixes: dd3bd23eb438 ("can: rcar_canfd: Add Renesas R-Car CAN FD
> > driver")
> > Suggested-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Link:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221025155657.1426948-2-
> biju.das.jz@xxxxx
> > nesas.com
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx#5.15.y
> > [mkl: adjust commit message]
> 
> I got 7 or so copies of this, with slightly different Cc: lines.

I followed option 1 mentioned in [1]

[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.10/process/stable-kernel-rules.html


> 
> AFAICT this is supposed to be stable kernel submission. In such case,
> I'd expect [PATCH 4.14, 4.19, 5.10] in the subject line, and original
> sign-off block from the mainline patch.

OK. Maybe [1] needs updating.

> 
> OTOH if it has Fixes tag (and it does) or Cc: stable (it has both),
> normally there's no need to do separate submission to stable, as Greg
> handles these automatically?

I got merge conflict mails for 4.9, 4.14, 4.19, 5.4, 5.10 and 5.15 stable.
I thought, I need to fix the conflicts and resend. Am I missing anything?? Please let me know.

Cheers,
biju











[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux