Re: [rft, PATCH v2 00/36] pinctrl: Clean up and add missed headers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 11:56 PM Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 10/10/2022 1:14 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Currently the header inclusion inside the pinctrl headers seems more arbitrary
> > than logical. This series is basically out of two parts:
> > - add missed headers to the pin control drivers / users
> > - clean up the headers of pin control subsystem
> >
> > The idea is to have this series to be pulled after -rc1 by the GPIO and
> > pin control subsystems, so all new drivers will utilize cleaned up headers
> > of the pin control.
> >
> > Please, review and comment.
>
> Did you really need to split this on a per-driver basis as opposed to
> just a treewide drivers/pinctrl, drivers/media and drivers/gpiolib patch
> set?
>
> 36 patches seems needlessly high when 4 patches could have achieve the
> same outcome.

I can combine them if maintainers ask for that, nevertheless for Intel
pin control and GPIO drivers, which I care more about, I would like to
leave as separate changes (easy to see in history what was done).


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux