On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 00:46:34 +0000 Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote: > I thought we have 2 types about the use of the treewide: > 1) Completely depends on multiple subsystems and/or > change multiple subsystems in a patch. > 2) Convenient for review. > > This patch series type is the 2) above. However, should I use > treewide for the 1) only? I thought "treewide" means you're changing something across the tree. If you want to get a new platform reviewed I'd just post the patches as RFC without any prefix in the subject. But I could be wrong. My main point (which I did a pretty poor job of actually making) was that for the networking driver to be merged it needs to get posted separately.
