Hi Geert, Thank you for the review. On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 1:32 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Prabhakar, > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 8:17 PM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Enable the minimal blocks required for booting the Renesas RZ/Five > > SMARC EVK with initramfs. > > > > Below are the blocks enabled: > > - CPG > > - CPU0 > > - DDR (memory regions) > > - PINCTRL > > - PLIC > > - SCIF0 > > > > Note we have deleted the nodes from the DT for which support needs to be > > added for RZ/Five SoC and are enabled by RZ/G2UL SMARC EVK SoM/carrier > > board DTS/I. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > v2->v3 > > * Dropped RB tags from Conor and Geert > > * Now re-using the SoM and carrier board DTS/I from RZ/G2UL > > Thanks for the update! > > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g043f01-smarc.dts > > @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > > +/* > > + * Device Tree Source for the RZ/Five SMARC EVK > > + * > > + * Copyright (C) 2022 Renesas Electronics Corp. > > + */ > > + > > +/dts-v1/; > > + > > +/* > > + * DIP-Switch SW1 setting > > + * 1 : High; 0: Low > > + * SW1-2 : SW_SD0_DEV_SEL (0: uSD; 1: eMMC) > > + * SW1-3 : SW_ET0_EN_N (0: ETHER0; 1: CAN0, CAN1, SSI1, RSPI1) > > + * Please change below macros according to SW1 setting on SoM > > "on the SoM" (like in r9a07g043u11-smarc.dts)? > Agreed, I will update it. > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi > > @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > > +/* > > + * Device Tree Source for the RZ/Five SMARC EVK SOM > > + * > > + * Copyright (C) 2022 Renesas Electronics Corp. > > + */ > > + > > +#include <arm64/renesas/rzg2ul-smarc-som.dtsi> > > + > > +/ { > > + aliases { > > + /delete-property/ ethernet0; > > + /delete-property/ ethernet1; > > OK > I assume you are OK with dropping the above too? > > + }; > > + > > + chosen { > > + bootargs = "ignore_loglevel"; > > + }; > > +}; > > + > > +#if (SW_SW0_DEV_SEL) > > +/delete-node/ &adc; > > +#endif > > + > > +#if (!SW_ET0_EN_N) > > +/delete-node/ ð0; > > +#endif > > +/delete-node/ ð1; > > + > > +/delete-node/ &ostm1; > > +/delete-node/ &ostm2; > > Given they are all placeholders, do you really need to delete them? > (more below) > I did retest without deleting the place holders and I dont see any issues (or splat) while booting up so I'll drop them while sending the v4. Cheers, Prabhakar