RE: [PATCH net-next v3] ravb: Add RZ/G2L MII interface support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Sergey,

> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] ravb: Add RZ/G2L MII interface support
> 
> On 9/14/22 8:20 PM, Biju Das wrote:
> 
> [...]
> >>> EMAC IP found on RZ/G2L Gb ethernet supports MII interface.
> >>> This patch adds support for selecting MII interface mode.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>> v2->v3:
> >>>  * Documented CXR35_HALFCYC_CLKSW1000 and CXR35_SEL_XMII_MII macros.
> >>
> >>    I definitely didn't mean it done this way...
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
> >>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
> >>> index b980bce763d3..058aceac8c92 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
> >>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
> >> [...]
> >>> @@ -965,6 +966,11 @@ enum CXR31_BIT {
> >>>  	CXR31_SEL_LINK1	= 0x00000008,
> >>>  };
> >>>
> >>> +enum CXR35_BIT {
> >>> +	CXR35_HALFCYC_CLKSW1000	= 0x03E80000,	/* 1000 cycle of clk_chi
> >> */
> >>
> >>    No, please just declare:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> 	CXR35_HALFCYC_CLKSW	= 0xffff0000,
> >
> > Q1) Why do you think we should use this value for setting MII?
> 
>    Where are you seeing me asking for that? This is just the field
> declaration, correct against the manual... we can safely omit it as
> well...

OK will keep it as field declaration and use actual value during setting.

> 
> [...]
> >>> +	CXR35_SEL_XMII_MII	= 0x00000002,	/* MII interface is used
> >> */
> >>
> >>    All the other register *enum*s are declared from LSB to MSB. The
> >> comment is pretty self-obvious here, please remove it. And declare
> >> the whole field too:
> >>
> >> 	CXR35_SEL_XMII		= 0x00000003,
> >
> > Values 1 and 3 are reserved so we cannot use 3.
> 
>    Again, this is the filed declaration, correct against the manual...

OK. Will add it.

> 
> > I think the current patch holds good as per the hardware manual for
> > selecting MII interface.
> 
>    It is incomplete, compared against the manual. And declaring
> CXR35_HALFCYC_CLKSW1000 just looks completely ridiculous. :-)

Ok. All good now. Will send 4.

Cheers,
Biju




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux