* Saravana Kannan <saravanak@xxxxxxxxxx> [220813 00:45]: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 2:49 AM Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > * Saravana Kannan <saravanak@xxxxxxxxxx> [220810 05:54]: > > > Tony, > > > > > > This should handle the odd case of the child being the supplier of the > > > parent. Can you please give this a shot? I want to make sure the cycle > > > detection code handles this properly and treats it like it's NOT a cycle. > > > > Yup, this series works for me, so feel free to add: > > > > Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks for testing! > > Btw, out of curiosity, how many different boards did you test this on? > IIRC you had an issue only in one board, right? Not to say I didn't > break anything else, I'm just trying to see how much confidence we > have on this series so far. I'm hoping the rest of the folks I listed > in the email will get around to testing this series. Sorry if I was not clear earlier. The issue affects several generations of TI 32-bit SoCs at least, not just one board. > > I have some concerns though on how do we get a working -rc1 with the > > earlier series applied? See the comments in the last patch of this > > series. > > I tried to reply, but not sure if it helps. We'll continue the discussion there. Ack. Tony
