On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 09:18:31AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > On Sun, Jul 3, 2022 at 8:35 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski > <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > As suggested by Rob [1], I organized a bit bindings for SoC devices having > > similar purpose - chip identification. What's the base? It didn't apply for me. > > > > These sometimes are put under nvmem directory, although in that case the > > purpose is usually broader than just chipid. > > Thanks for your series! > > > dt-bindings: hwinfo: group Chip ID-like devices > > dt-bindings: hwinfo: samsung,s5pv210-chipid: add S5PV210 ChipID > > So why not call it "chipid"? > "hwinfo" sounds too generic to me; aren't all DT bindings hardware > information? I'm fine with hwinfo as the color of the shed. I don't think we should encode where the information comes from. Rob
