Hi Geert, > > - dev_info(dev, "TSC%u: Loaded %d trip points\n", i, ret); > > + dev_info(dev, "Sensor %u: Trip points loaded: %u\n", i, ret); > > I actually prefer the old wording (I'm undecided about "sensor" vs. > "TSC", though, but consistency rules), as it makes it clear "ret" > is the number of trip points, and not a success code. I think "Sensor" is actually important. E.g. on Spider, Sensor 0 is TSC1 because there is no TSC0. So, the TSC numbering is confusing. I'll try to reword it so that the number of points becomes clear again.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
