Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: adc: Document Renesas RZ/G2UL ADC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Biju,

On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 9:39 AM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: adc: Document Renesas RZ/G2UL
> > ADC
> > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 9:04 AM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > > Document Renesas RZ/G2UL ADC bindings. RZ/G2UL ADC is almost identical
> > > to RZ/G2L, but it has 2 analog input channels compared to 8 channels
> > > on the RZ/G2L.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/renesas,rzg2l-adc.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/renesas,rzg2l-adc.yaml
> > > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ properties:
> > >    compatible:
> > >      items:
> > >        - enum:
> > > +          - renesas,r9a07g043-adc   # RZ/G2UL
> > >            - renesas,r9a07g044-adc   # RZ/G2L
> > >            - renesas,r9a07g054-adc   # RZ/V2L
> > >        - const: renesas,rzg2l-adc
> > > @@ -76,16 +77,43 @@ patternProperties:
> > >      properties:
> > >        reg:
> > >          description: |
> > > -          The channel number. It can have up to 8 channels numbered from
> > 0 to 7.
> > > -        items:
> > > -          - minimum: 0
> > > -            maximum: 7
> > > +          The channel number.
> > >
> > >      required:
> > >        - reg
> > >
> > >      additionalProperties: false
> > >
> > > +allOf:
> > > +  - if:
> > > +      properties:
> > > +        compatible:
> > > +          contains:
> > > +            const: renesas,r9a07g043-adc
> > > +    then:
> > > +      patternProperties:
> > > +        "^channel@[2-7]$": false
> > > +        "^channel@[0-1]$":
> > > +          type: object
> > > +          properties:
> > > +            reg:
> > > +              description: |
> > > +                It can have up to 2 channels numbered from 0 to 1.
> >
> > IMHO the description doesn't add any value, as it's equivalent to the logic
> > below.
>
> It is suggested by Jonathan on my previous version. If there is no objection,
> I can drop this.

OK.

> > > +              items:
> >
> > I don't think the "items" is needed or wanted, as there can be only one?
>
> It will be 2 right? eg:- reg = <0> and reg = <1>;
>
> Without this reg index validation fails.

I mean just drop the "items", but keep the rest:

    properties:
      reg:
        minimum: 0
        maximum: 1

(taken from Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/pata-common.yaml ;-)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux