On 03/05/2022 08:51, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >>>> This should not be a reason why a property is or is not required. Either >>>> this is required for device operation or not. If it is required, should >>>> be in the bindings. Otherwise what are you going to do in the future? >>>> Add a required property breaking the ABI? >>> >>> The problem is that there are no bindings for the reset controller >>> (actually the reset controller feature of the system-controller) yet. >>> Yeah, we can just add #reset-cells = <1> to the system-controller >>> device node, but we cannot add the actual resets properties to the >>> consumers, until the actual cell values are defined. >> >> Sounds like you should implement providers first. Or just live with the >> warning as a reminder to implement the reset provider? > > I'd go for the latter. The upstream r9a06g032.dtsi is still under active > development. Until very recently, the only device supported was the > serial console. For clocks we use in such cases fixed-clock placeholders or empty phandles. Maybe something like that would work here as well? Best regards, Krzysztof
