Re: [PATCH v8 4/5] media: renesas: vsp1: Add VSP1_HAS_NON_ZERO_LBA feature bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Biju,

On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 8:18 PM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As per HW manual V3M and RZ/G2L SoC's has non zero LIF buffer
> attributes. So introduce a feature bit for handling the same.
>
> This patch also add separate device info structure for V3M and V3H
> SoC, as both these SoC's share the same model ID, but V3H does not
> have VSP1_HAS_NON_ZERO_LBA feature bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v8:
>  * New patch

Thanks for your patch!

> --- a/drivers/media/platform/renesas/vsp1/vsp1_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/renesas/vsp1/vsp1_drv.c
> @@ -782,6 +782,7 @@ static const struct vsp1_device_info vsp1_device_infos[] = {
>         }, {
>                 .version = VI6_IP_VERSION_MODEL_VSPD_V3,
>                 .model = "VSP2-D",
> +               .soc = VI6_IP_VERSION_SOC_V3H,
>                 .gen = 3,
>                 .features = VSP1_HAS_BRS | VSP1_HAS_BRU,
>                 .lif_count = 1,
> @@ -789,6 +790,17 @@ static const struct vsp1_device_info vsp1_device_infos[] = {
>                 .uif_count = 1,
>                 .wpf_count = 1,
>                 .num_bru_inputs = 5,
> +       }, {
> +               .version = VI6_IP_VERSION_MODEL_VSPD_V3,
> +               .model = "VSP2-D",
> +               .soc = VI6_IP_VERSION_SOC_V3M,
> +               .gen = 3,
> +               .features = VSP1_HAS_BRS | VSP1_HAS_BRU | VSP1_HAS_NON_ZERO_LBA,
> +               .lif_count = 1,
> +               .rpf_count = 5,
> +               .uif_count = 1,
> +               .wpf_count = 1,
> +               .num_bru_inputs = 5,
>         }, {
>                 .version = VI6_IP_VERSION_MODEL_VSPDL_GEN3,
>                 .model = "VSP2-DL",
> @@ -832,8 +844,12 @@ static const struct vsp1_device_info *vsp1_lookup_info(struct vsp1_device *vsp1)
>         for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(vsp1_device_infos); ++i) {
>                 info = &vsp1_device_infos[i];
>
> -               if ((vsp1->version & VI6_IP_VERSION_MODEL_MASK) == info->version)
> +               if ((vsp1->version & VI6_IP_VERSION_MODEL_MASK) == info->version) {
> +                       if (info->version == VI6_IP_VERSION_MODEL_VSPD_V3 &&
> +                           ((vsp1->version & VI6_IP_VERSION_SOC_MASK) != info->soc))

This check looks fragile to me.
What about

    if (info->soc && (vsp1->version & VI6_IP_VERSION_SOC_MASK) != info->soc))

?

> +                               continue;
>                         break;
> +               }
>         }

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux