On 24/04/2022 09:50, Biju Das wrote:
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a07g044: Fix external clk
>> node names
>>
>> Hi Krzysztof Kozlowski,
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback.
>>
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a07g044: Fix external
>>> clk node names
>>>
>>> On 23/04/2022 16:06, Biju Das wrote:
>>>> Fix audio clk node names with "_" -> "-" and add suffix '-clk' for
>>>> can and extal clks.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044.dtsi | 8 ++++----
>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044.dtsi
>>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044.dtsi
>>>> index 19287cccb1f0..4f9a84d7af08 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044.dtsi
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044.dtsi
>>>> @@ -13,14 +13,14 @@ / {
>>>> #address-cells = <2>;
>>>> #size-cells = <2>;
>>>>
>>>> - audio_clk1: audio_clk1 {
>>>> + audio_clk1: audio-clk1 {
>>>
>>> How about in such case keeping suffix "clk" everywhere and moving the
>>> index
>>> (1/2) to the first part? This way one day maybe schema will match the
>>> clocks.
>>
>> Just a question,
>>
>> Your suggestion is "audio_clk1: audio-clk1" -> "audio_clk1: audio-clk"
>>
>> In that case, If you plan to drop the label in future, how will you
>> differentiate between
>> audio-clk1 and audio-clk2 with just node names?
>
> Or
>
> Do you want me to do the change like this?
>
> "audio_clk1: audio-clk1" -> "audio_clk_1: audio-clk-1"
>
> And fix the phandle reference in other dtsi files??
My suggestion was to move the [12] part into the first part, so the
suffix "clk" stays consistent:
audio1-clk
audio2-clk
Best regards,
Krzysztof
