Re: [PATCH 2/7] ufs: add UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_64BIT_ADDRESS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] ufs: add UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_64BIT_ADDRESS
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 23:45:55 -0700
Cc: alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx, avri.altman@xxxxxxx, robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx, krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx, jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20220412073647.3808493-3-yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
References: <20220412073647.3808493-1-yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> <20220412073647.3808493-3-yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 04:36:42PM +0900, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> Add UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_64BIT_ADDRESS for a broken host controller
> of the 64-bit addressing supported capability.

Why can't you just clear MASK_64_ADDRESSING_SUPPORT for this case?

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [PATCH 2/7] ufs: add UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_64BIT_ADDRESS
  - From: Yoshihiro Shimoda

References:
- [PATCH 0/7] treewide: scsi: ufs: Add support for Renesas R-Car UFS controller
  - From: Yoshihiro Shimoda
- [PATCH 2/7] ufs: add UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_64BIT_ADDRESS
  - From: Yoshihiro Shimoda

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH net-next 09/12] ARM: dts: r9a06g032: describe MII converter
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH net-next 02/12] net: dsa: add Renesas RZ/N1 switch tag driver
Previous by thread: [PATCH 2/7] ufs: add UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_64BIT_ADDRESS
Next by thread: RE: [PATCH 2/7] ufs: add UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_64BIT_ADDRESS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SOC] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]