Hi Geert, geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on Tue, 12 Apr 2022 09:37:22 +0200: > Hi Miquel, > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 9:32 AM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on Mon, 11 Apr 2022 17:09:50 +0200: > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 10:16 AM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Wed, 06 Apr 2022 17:45:09 -0700: > > > > > Quoting Miquel Raynal (2022-04-06 09:18:47) > > > > > > Here is a first series bringing DMA support to RZN1 platforms. Soon a > > > > > > second series will come with changes made to the UART controller > > > > > > driver, in order to interact with the RZN1 DMA controller. > > > > > > > > > > > > Stephen acked the sysctrl patch (in the clk driver) but somehow I feel > > > > > > like it would be good to have this patch applied on both sides > > > > > > (dmaengine and clk) because more changes will depend on the addition of > > > > > > this helper, that are not related to DMA at all. I'll let you folks > > > > > > figure out what is best. > > > > > > > > > > Are you sending more patches in the next 7 weeks or so that will touch > > > > > the same area? If so, then it sounds like I'll need to take the clk > > > > > patch through clk tree. I don't know what is best because I don't have > > > > > the information about what everyone plans to do in that file. > > > > > > > > This series brings DMA support and needs to access the dmamux registers > > > > that are in the sysctrl area. > > > > > > > > I've sent an RTC series which needs to access this area as well, but > > > > it is not fully ready yet as it was advised to go for a reset > > > > controller in this case. The reset controller would be registered by > > > > the clock driver, so yes it would touch the same file. > > > > > > > > Finally, there is an USB series that is coming soon, I don't know if > > > > it will be ready for merge for 5.19, but it needs to access a specific > > > > register in this area as well (h2mode). > > > > > > > > So provided that we are able to contribute this reset driver quickly > > > > enough, I would argue that it is safer to merge the clk changes in the > > > > clk tree. > > > > > > The clk tree or the renesas-clk tree? ;-) > > > > Actually I forgot about this tree, would you mind to merge *all* the > > patches that depend on the sysctrl changes in the renesas/renesas-clk > > tree? This also stands for the UART and RTC for instance. Otherwise > > you'll need to set up immutable branches and share them with the > > dmaengine, serial and rtc trees. I'm fine either way, it's just much > > less work in the first situation IMHO. > > Sure, I can do that, given acks from the DMA, UART, and RTC > maintainers. Ok, I'll say so in the cover letter of the v9. > So far I've been rather terse in giving feedback on these series, > as I'm in wait-and-see mode w.r.t. what else you've planned for the > sysctrl DT node[1] and clock/sys controller code... > > [1] Did I say I'm not that fond of child nodes? But for the dmamux, > it looks like a good solution to handle this. O:-) I plan in the coming days to write a proper reset controller driver that will be queried by the rtc driver (as proposed by Alexandre). Which means I'll have to declare this reset controller as a child of the systrl node. If you disagree with it, you may jump-in, see this thread : Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] soc: renesas: rzn1-sysc: Export a function to enable/disable the RTC Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 10:32:31 +0200 Thanks, Miquèl
