RE: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Jump to error path instead of returning directly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Prabhkar,

> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Jump to error path instead of
> returning directly
> 
> Hi Biju,
> 
> Thank you for the review.
> 
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 7:02 PM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Prabhakar and Pavel,
> >
> > Thanks for the patch.
> >
> > > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Jump to error path instead
> > > of returning directly
> > >
> > > Jump to error path "edisclk" instead of returning directly in case
> > > of
> > > devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive() failure.
> > >
> > > Fixes: b4d86f37eacb7 ("mmc: renesas_sdhi: do hard reset if
> > > possible")
> > > Reported-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar
> > > <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c | 6 ++++--
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c
> > > b/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c
> > > index 2797a9c0f17d..cddb0185f5fb 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c
> > > @@ -1033,8 +1033,10 @@ int renesas_sdhi_probe(struct platform_device
> > > *pdev,
> > >               goto efree;
> > >
> > >       priv->rstc =
> > > devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive(&pdev->dev,
> > > NULL);
> > > -     if (IS_ERR(priv->rstc))
> > > -             return PTR_ERR(priv->rstc);
> > > +     if (IS_ERR(priv->rstc)) {
> > > +             ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rstc);
> > > +             goto edisclk;
> > > +     }
> >
> > Why can't devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive to be moved up
> before devm_clk_get?
> >
> In that case we will have to jump to the "efree" label Or if you don't
> want goto at all this can be moved to the very beginning of the probe.

I guess it has to move up, first get reset handle and clock handle and return error
directly in case of error, Then do clk/reset ops. 

> 
> Wolfram, what is your preference on the above?
> 
> Cheers,
> Prabhakar




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux