Am Montag, 28. März 2022, 15:21:08 CEST schrieb Jonathan Neuschäfer: > * PGP Signed by an unknown key > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 02:09:14AM +0200, Ansuel Smith wrote: > > Hi, > > as the title say, the intention of this ""series"" is to finally > > categorize > > the ARM dts directory in subdirectory for each oem. > > [...] > > > [1] https://gist.github.com/Ansuel/47c49925ee7ef4b1dd035afc74679ab5 > > [2] https://gist.github.com/Ansuel/19f61f1e583c49407ce35c10e770fbe0 > > Nice idea, thank you! > > A few notes on categorization below. > [...] > > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile > > Freescale has been part of NXP for a while, so it might make sense to > merge the freescale and nxp directories. I can't speak for > NXP-the-company, so that's just my view as a bystander. Please don't mix the names for arm and arm64. It's very confusing if the vendor directory is named differently for each architecture. >[...] > > create mode 120000 arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/armv7-m.dtsi > > armv7-m.dtsi is a bit confusing, because it contains a few devices at > fixed addresses, so it looks vendor-specific at a first glance into the > file. However, if it is actually as vendor-neutral as the name implies, > I think it should live dts/ directly, rather than in vendor > subdirectories. This seems to be some generic devices common for all ARMv7M CPUs used in Cortex-M CPUs. It's also used by some stm32 .dtsi. Best regards, Alexander
