Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 0/2] ARM: r9a06g032: add support for the watchdogs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/18/22 11:26, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote:
Hi,

I did not receive any feedback for those 2 patches of the v3 of this
series, so resending them. The rest of the patches (dt-stuff) have


Well, yes, you didn't send it to linux-watchdog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, which
I use as base for reviews, to collect review feedback, and as source
for applying the patches. On top of that, you didn't provide change logs
either, meaning I'd have to dig on the web to find older versions of
your patches (since they won't be in watchdog patchwork either) and
compare those. All that takes a lot of time, and you really should not
expect fast turnaround (if any - your v2 got completely lost for me).

Also, FWIW, after doing just that right now I still disagree that it makes
sense to have a watchdog interrupt do nothing. That is just as good as no
watchdog.

Guenter



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux