Hi Wolfram,
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 9:46 AM Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > This is not QSPI, but HF.
>
> Ah, okay.
>
> > Building a new firmware for R-Car H3 ES1.0 with HF unlocked will be
> > complicated, as it is not supported by upstream TF-A.
>
> You mean QSPI here?
No, HF. Salvator-X(S) boots from HF.
> > Note that HF also fails to probe on R-Car M3-W and M3-N ES1.0.
>
> Do you have this patch form Andrew in your tree:
>
> [PATCH] memory: renesas-rpc-if: Avoid unaligned bus access for HyperFlash
Sure I have it. It's in v5.16 ;-)
> Even if so, I don't think that reverting patches is the solution. As you
Sure, a plain revert is definitely not the right solution.
> could see from Andrew's patch, HyperFlash was also broken before and it
> just may need more fixes for Gen3 perhaps? IIRC my patches didn't break
> Andrew's tests but maybe we should ask him again. Maybe Andrew has also
> some more ideas, I only did QSPI.
My understanding from reading the threads is that Andrew's patch and
yours arrived in parallel, and are believed to fix two different and
non-intersecting things (QSPI vs. HF). I also found no explicit mention
that Andrew tried your patch.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
