On 2/8/22 3:31 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
[...]
>>> I might have missed something, but it seems the only user of IRQ 0 on
>>> SuperH is smsc911x Ethernet in arch/sh/boards/board-apsh4a3a.c and
>>> arch/sh/boards/board-apsh4ad0a.c, which use evt2irq(0x200).
>>> These should have been seeing the "0 is an invalid IRQ number"
>>> warning splat since it was introduced in commit a85a6c86c25be2d2
>>> ("driver core: platform: Clarify that IRQ 0 is invalid"). Or not:
>>
>> Warning or no warning, 0 is still returned. :-/
>> My attempt to put an end to this has stuck waiting a review from the IRQ
>> people...
>
> I had another look at this after you asked about it on IRC. I don't
> know much SH assembly, but I suspect IRQ 0 has not been delivered
> since 2009 after 1e1030dccb10 ("sh: nmi_debug support."). On a
Mhm... this commit changes the SH3 code while SH778x are SH4A, no?
[...]
>
> Arnd
MBR, Sergey
