> Don't we want to introduce a family-specific compatible value for > R-Car Gen4? At least the SCSS seems to be a new R-Car Gen4 feature > common to R-Car S4 and R-Car V3U (yes, the latter is advertised as > the first member of the R-Car Gen4 family, so I intend to move it > over to renesas,rcar-gen4-* where it makes sense). Yeah, sure we want the family compatible. But for now it can point to I2C_RCAR_GEN3, so the patch can stay as is. That is what I was wondering about why a v2 was needed. If we add SCSS, we can update the family compatible data for Gen4 to I2C_RCAR_GEN4. Unless I miss something.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
