Hi Geert, Thanks for the feedback. > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: renesas: rzg2l-smarc: Add common dtsi > file > > Hi Biju, Prabhakar, > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 10:52 AM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > RZ/G2L and RZ/G2LC SoC use the same carrier board, but the SoM is > > different. > > > > Different pin mapping is possible on SoM. For eg:- RZ/G2L SMARC EVK > > uses SCIF2, whereas RZ/G2LC uses SCIF1 for the serial interface > > available on PMOD1. > > > > This patch adds support for handling the pin mapping differences by > > moving definitions common to RZ/G2L and RZ/G2LC to a common dtsi file. > > > > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks for your patch! > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044c2-smarc.dts > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044c2-smarc.dts > > > @@ -66,11 +65,6 @@ > > status = "disabled"; > > }; > > > > -&scif2 { > > - /delete-property/ pinctrl-0; > > In the meantime, one more line for pinctrl-names should be deleted. > > > - status = "disabled"; > > -}; > > - > > &spi1 { > > /delete-property/ pinctrl-0; > > status = "disabled"; > > The rest LGTM, so > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/rzg2l-smarc.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/rzg2l-smarc.dtsi > > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ > > // SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > > /* > > - * Device Tree Source for the RZ/G2L SMARC EVK common parts > > + * Device Tree Source for the RZ/G2L SMARC EVK parts > > * > > * Copyright (C) 2021 Renesas Electronics Corp. > > */ > > Note that the above conflicts with "[PATCH v2 11/12] arm64: dts: > renesas: Add initial device tree for RZ/V2L SMARC EVK"[1], which I had > queued in renesas-devel, but dropped again due to a missing dependency on > the clock bindings include file. In the meantime, the updated clock > bindings include file is ready. > > So, which one has the highest priority: this series, or RZ/V2L? V2L is higher priority. I will rebase and send V2. Cheers, Biju > > [1] > https://jpn01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.ker > nel.org%2Fall%2F20220110134659.30424-12-prabhakar.mahadev- > lad.rj%40bp.renesas.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cbiju.das.jz%40bp.renesas.com > %7Cf50386cff0f44f8bd06a08d9e5a27b0b%7C53d82571da1947e49cb4625a166a4a2a%7C0 > %7C0%7C637793308284273842%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQ > IjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=lGdj6Cp4XNNQbY > scJPxGcaw6u1v34Bp0P6cTY7WxUN8%3D&reserved=0 > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert > > -- > Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux- > m68k.org > > In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. > But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something > like that. > -- Linus Torvalds