Re: [PATCH v2 10/12] arm64: dts: renesas: Add initial DTSI for RZ/V2L SoC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Rob,

On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 3:00 PM Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 7:47 AM Lad Prabhakar
> <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The RZ/V2L is package- and pin-compatible with the RZ/G2L. The only
> > difference being the RZ/V2L SoC has additional DRP-AI IP (AI
> > accelerator).
> >
> > Add initial DTSI for RZ/V2L SoC with below SoC specific dtsi files for
> > supporting single core and dual core devices.
> >
> > r9a07g054l1.dtsi => RZ/V2L R9A07G054L1 SoC specific parts
> > r9a07g054l2.dtsi => RZ/V2L R9A07G054L2 SoC specific parts
> >
> > Both RZ/G2L and RZ/V2L SMARC EVK SoM  are identical apart from SoC's
> > used hence the common dtsi files (rzg2l-smarc*.dtsi) are share between
> > RZ/G2L and RZ/V2L SMARC EVK. Place holders are added in device nodes to
> > avoid compilation errors for the devices which have not been enabled yet
> > on RZ/V2L SoC.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g054.dtsi
> > @@ -0,0 +1,491 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +/*
> > + * Device Tree Source for the RZ/V2L SoC
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2021 Renesas Electronics Corp.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> > +#include <dt-bindings/clock/r9a07g054-cpg.h>
>
> linux-next is failing because this header is missing:
>
> In file included from arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g054l2.dtsi:9,
>                  from arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g054l2-smarc.dts:9:
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g054.dtsi:9:10: fatal error:
> dt-bindings/clock/r9a07g054-cpg.h: No such file or directory
>     9 | #include <dt-bindings/clock/r9a07g054-cpg.h>
>       |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Thanks, I have already removed the offending commits from renesas-next.
as the header is not ready yet.

Interestingly, kernel test robot reported a success for that branch...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux