On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 8:41 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 1:45 AM Prabhakar Mahadev Lad
> <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 2:41 PM Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > > + if (np) {
> > >
> > > Same comments as per your other patches, i.e.
> > > Why is this check here?
> > >
> > Because the interrupt resource has range of interrupts in one IRQ resource [0]. Let me know if there is any other alternative way to avoid such case.
>
> Shouldn't be fixed in platform_get_irq_optional() to return IRQ by
> index for all cases?
>
Sorry, I don't get you here. Wasn't your earlier comment for np check?
Cheers,
Prabhakar
