Re: [PATCH 1/3] i2c: bcm2835: Use platform_get_irq() to get the interrupt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Florian,

Thank you for the review.

On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 9:17 PM Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/18/2021 8:52 AM, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> > platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, ..) relies on static
> > allocation of IRQ resources in DT core code, this causes an issue
> > when using hierarchical interrupt domains using "interrupts" property
> > in the node as this bypasses the hierarchical setup and messes up the
> > irq chaining.
> >
> > In preparation for removal of static setup of IRQ resource from DT core
> > code use platform_get_irq().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Just one nit below:
> > ---
> >   drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm2835.c | 11 ++++-------
> >   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm2835.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm2835.c
> > index 37443edbf754..d63dec5f3cb1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm2835.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm2835.c
> > @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static const struct i2c_adapter_quirks bcm2835_i2c_quirks = {
> >   static int bcm2835_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >   {
> >       struct bcm2835_i2c_dev *i2c_dev;
> > -     struct resource *mem, *irq;
> > +     struct resource *mem;
> >       int ret;
> >       struct i2c_adapter *adap;
> >       struct clk *mclk;
> > @@ -452,12 +452,9 @@ static int bcm2835_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >               return ret;
> >       }
> >
> > -     irq = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0);
> > -     if (!irq) {
> > -             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No IRQ resource\n");
> > -             return -ENODEV;
> > -     }
> > -     i2c_dev->irq = irq->start;
> > +     i2c_dev->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > +     if (i2c_dev->irq <= 0)
> > +             return i2c_dev->irq ? i2c_dev->irq : -ENXIO;
>
> Why not just check for a negative return code and propagate it as is?
>
platform_get_irq() may return 0 said that we do get a splat in this
case and further request_irq() will fail so instead check it here.

Cheers,
Prabhakar



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux