Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: mmc: renesas,sdhi: add optional SDnH clock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Biju,

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 12:26 PM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: mmc: renesas,sdhi: add optional SDnH
> > clock
> > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 9:32 PM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: mmc: renesas,sdhi: add optional
> > > > SDnH clock
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > +      if:
> > > > > > +        properties:
> > > > > > +          compatible:
> > > > > > +            contains:
> > > > > > +              enum:
> > > > > > +                - renesas,rcar-gen2-sdhi
> > > > > > +                - renesas,rcar-gen3-sdhi
> > > > >
> > > > > What about RZ/G2L, as it has 4 clocks?
> > > >
> > > > They are a few lines above this in a seperate block if I am not
> > > > confusing the SoC numbering.
> > >
> > > Ah ok, I thought, since RZ/G2L using generic rcar-gen3-sdhi
> > > compatible, We need to move that Separate block inside this if block.
> > > With in gen3 compatible, if RZG2L then Max 4 clocks else Max 3 Clocks. I
> > may be completely wrong.
> >
> > But is it working?
> > With this series, the driver looks for the "sdh" clock, while it is called
> > "clk_hs" on RZ/G2L.
> >
> > As the RZ/G2L part declares compatibility with the generic rcar-gen3-sdhi
> > compatible, it is subject to SDHI_FLAG_NEED_CLKH_FALLBACK.
> > In the absence of an "sdh" clock, the driver will use
> > clk_get_parent(clk_get_parent(priv->clk) instead.
> > On RZ/G2L, we have:
> >   SD0 -> SD0_DIV4 -> imclk
> >       -> clk_hs
> > So that will pick up SD0, which might be correct, accidentally ;-) As
> > quirks is not set, it will use clkh_shift = 2.
> >
> > So all is good? I think we still want the driver to check for "clk_hs",
> > too, to avoid having to depend on the fallback.
>
> I have added below piece of code and tested clk_hs. It works ok.
>
> Can we change the binding to update to use "clkh" instead of "clk_hs" for RZ/G2L?, so that we don't need
> below code change in driver. Any way it is optional.

Fine for me.
Should we also rename imclk2 to cd?

Note that on RZ/G2L, it will be handled by Runtime PM regardless.

> +
> +       if(!priv->clkh) {
> +               priv->clkh = devm_clk_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "clk_hs");
> +               if (IS_ERR(priv->clkh))
> +                       return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(priv->clkh), "cannot get clk_hs");

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux