Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add Renesas R-Car

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 10/27/21 16:12, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 09:30:18 +0200, Julien Massot wrote:
Renesas R-Car SoCs may contains a Realtime processor.
This patch adds binding for this remote processor.

Signed-off-by: Julien Massot <julien.massot@xxxxxxx>
---
  .../remoteproc/renesas,rcar-rproc.yaml        | 66 +++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 66 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/renesas,rcar-rproc.yaml


My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):

yamllint warnings/errors:

dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/renesas,rcar-rproc.example.dts:26.17-46: Warning (reg_format): /example-0/reserved-memory/cr7_ram@40040000:reg: property has invalid length (8 bytes) (#address-cells == 2, #size-cells == 1)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/renesas,rcar-rproc.example.dts:22.13-20: Warning (ranges_format): /example-0/reserved-memory:ranges: empty "ranges" property but its #address-cells (2) differs from /example-0 (1)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/renesas,rcar-rproc.example.dt.yaml: Warning (pci_device_reg): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format'
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/renesas,rcar-rproc.example.dt.yaml: Warning (pci_device_bus_num): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format'
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/renesas,rcar-rproc.example.dt.yaml: Warning (simple_bus_reg): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format'
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/renesas,rcar-rproc.example.dt.yaml: Warning (i2c_bus_reg): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format'
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/renesas,rcar-rproc.example.dt.yaml: Warning (spi_bus_reg): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format'
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/renesas,rcar-rproc.example.dts:24.39-27.15: Warning (avoid_default_addr_size): /example-0/reserved-memory/cr7_ram@40040000: Relying on default #address-cells value
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/renesas,rcar-rproc.example.dts:24.39-27.15: Warning (avoid_default_addr_size): /example-0/reserved-memory/cr7_ram@40040000: Relying on default #size-cells value
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/renesas,rcar-rproc.example.dt.yaml: Warning (unique_unit_address): Failed prerequisite 'avoid_default_addr_size'
Indeed address-cells and size-cells was not specified in this binding example,
will be fixed in next version.

Thanks for the test !

Regards,
--
Julien Massot [IoT.bzh]




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux