Hi Geert,
On 2021-10-14 13:07:30 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Niklas,
>
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 12:48 PM Niklas Söderlund
> <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 2021-10-13 17:08:44 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 8:48 PM Niklas Söderlund
> > > <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Convert ADV748X analog video decoder documentation to json-schema.
>
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/adv748x.yaml
>
> > > > +allOf:
> > > > + - if:
> > > > + properties:
> > > > + compatible:
> > > > + contains:
> > > > + const: adi,adv7481
> > > > + then:
> > > > + properties:
> > > > + interrupts:
> > > > + minItems: 1
> > > > + maxItems: 3
> > > > +
> > > > + interrupt-names:
> > > > + minItems: 1
> > > > + items:
> > > > + - enum: [ intrq1, intrq2, intrq3 ]
> > > > + - enum: [ intrq1, intrq2, intrq3 ]
> > > > + - enum: [ intrq1, intrq2, intrq3 ]
> > >
> > > They can really appear in any order?
> >
> > Yes, as not all interrupt lines may be wired up. It would be nice to
> > enforce that intrq2 must come before intrq3 if both are wired but I'm
> > not sure how to express that.
>
> You mean
>
> items:
> - const: intrq1
> - const: intrq2
> - const: intrq3
Will this not enforce that if intrq2 is present intrq1 must be too?
>
> ?
>
> If the first two might be exchanged, you can still fix the last one:
>
> items:
> - const: [ intrq1, intrq2 ]
> - const: [ intrq1, intrq2 ]
> - const: intrq3
Same here, will this not fail if only intrq3 is given?
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
--
Regards,
Niklas Söderlund
