> Both the fixes would apply to the first patch itself i.e. when > resource_size was added in ca7d8b980b67 and later in 59e27d7c94aa > resource_size was moved online below (this would cause kernel panic > res is NULL). Do you agree? Yes. I do wonder a little if we need the Fixes tag for ca7d8b980b67 because we fix 59e27d7c94aa which already fixes ca7d8b980b67, so there is a chain. But maybe redundancy doesn't hurt here. I don't mind.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
