On 9/20/21 2:05 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> We should get 'driver_data' from 'struct device' directly. Going via
> platform_device is an unneeded step back and forth.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Build tested only. buildbot is happy.
>
> drivers/net/mdio/mdio-bcm-iproc.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mdio/mdio-bcm-iproc.c b/drivers/net/mdio/mdio-bcm-iproc.c
> index 77fc970cdfde..5666cfab15b9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mdio/mdio-bcm-iproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mdio/mdio-bcm-iproc.c
> @@ -181,8 +181,7 @@ static int iproc_mdio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> static int iproc_mdio_resume(struct device *dev)
> {
> - struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> - struct iproc_mdio_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + struct iproc_mdio_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
The change looks good to me, however if you change from
platform_get_drvdata() to dev_get_drvdata(), you might also want to
change from using platform_set_drvdata() to dev_set_drvdata() for
symmetry no? If not, then maybe this patch should be dropped?
--
Florian
