From: Duc Nguyen <duc.nguyen.ub@xxxxxxxxxxx>
ENOTSUP has confused users. EINVAL has been considered clearer. Change
the errno, we were the only ones using ENOTSUP in this subsystem anyhow.
Signed-off-by: Duc Nguyen <duc.nguyen.ub@xxxxxxxxxxx>
[wsa: split and reworded commit message]
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-renesas-tpu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-renesas-tpu.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-renesas-tpu.c
index 4381df90a527..754440194650 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-renesas-tpu.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-renesas-tpu.c
@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ static int tpu_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *_pwm,
if (prescaler == ARRAY_SIZE(prescalers) || period == 0) {
dev_err(&tpu->pdev->dev, "clock rate mismatch\n");
- return -ENOTSUPP;
+ return -EINVAL;
}
if (duty_ns) {
--
2.30.2
