Re: [PATCH net-next 00/18] Add Gigabit Ethernet driver support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Biju,

On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 8:28 AM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/18] Add Gigabit Ethernet driver support
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 11:53:59PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > > On 7/22/21 5:13 PM, Biju Das wrote:
> > >
> > > > The DMAC and EMAC blocks of Gigabit Ethernet IP is almost similar to
> > Ethernet AVB.
> > > >
> > > > The Gigabit Etherner IP consists of Ethernet controller (E-MAC),
> > Internal TCP/IP Offload Engine (TOE) and Dedicated Direct memory access
> > controller (DMAC).
> > > >
> > > > With few changes in driver, we can support Gigabit ethernet driver as
> > well.
> > > >
> > > > This patch series is aims to support the same
> > > >
> > > > RFC->V1
> > > >   * Incorporated feedback from Andrew, Sergei, Geert and Prabhakar
> > > >   *
> > > > https://jpn01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpa
> > > > tchwork.kernel.org%2Fproject%2Flinux-renesas-soc%2Flist%2F%3Fseries%
> > > > 3D515525&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cbiju.das.jz%40bp.renesas.com%7C6fe3922cc
> > > > 35d4178cb1d08d94d54bc75%7C53d82571da1947e49cb4625a166a4a2a%7C0%7C0%7
> > > > C637625848601442706%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQ
> > > > IjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=bOpIqV1g
> > > > lMUXqz9rsX0UK3Oqap2J1cY86TGVOJvzYe4%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > > >
> > > > Biju Das (18):
> > > >   dt-bindings: net: renesas,etheravb: Document Gigabit Ethernet IP
> > > >   drivers: clk: renesas: rzg2l-cpg: Add support to handle MUX clocks
> > > >   drivers: clk: renesas: r9a07g044-cpg: Add ethernet clock sources
> > > >   drivers: clk: renesas: r9a07g044-cpg: Add GbEthernet clock/reset
> > >
> > >
> > >    It's not a good idea to have the patch to the defferent subsystems
> > > lumped all together in a single series...
> >
> > Agreed.
> >
> > Are these changes inseparable? If so, you need to be up front on this, and
> > you need an agreement with the subsystem maintainers how the patches are
> > going to be merged? Through which tree. And you need Acked-by from the
> > other tree maintainers.
> >
> > Ideally you submit multiple patchsets. This assumes all sets will compile
> > independently.
>
> Agreed. Will split this patch series in 3 patchsets
>
> 1) single binding patch
>
> 2) Clock patchset
>
> 3) ravb driver patchset.

4) dts part.

Part 2 should pass through renesas-clk.
Part 4 should pass through renesas-devel.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux