Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: clk: r9a07g044-cpg: Update clock definitions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Biju,

On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 1:11 PM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: clk: r9a07g044-cpg: Update clock
> > definitions
> > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 11:26 AM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: clk: r9a07g044-cpg: Update
> > > > clock definitions On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 11:58 AM Biju Das
> > > > <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Update clock definitions as per the RZG2L_clock_list(Rev.02) manual.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Lad Prabhakar
> > > > > <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your patch!
> > > >
> > > > > --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/r9a07g044-cpg.h
> > > > > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/r9a07g044-cpg.h
> >
> > > > I do think we need a separate list of definitions for resets.  While
> > > > simple modules like SCIF and I2C have a one-to-one mapping from
> > > > clock bits to reset bits for, this is not the case for all modules.
> > > > E.g. SDHI has 4 clocks per instance, but only a single reset signal
> > > > per instance, while CANFD has a single clock, but two reset signals.
> > >
> > > OK, Agreed. We will list separate definitions for resets like,
> > >
> > > #define R9A07G044_RST_SDHI0             X1
> > > #define R9A07G044_RST_SDHI1             X2
> > > #define R9A07G044_RST_CAN               X3
> >
> > Please use names that match the documentation, like R9A07G044_SDHI0_IXRST
> > and R9A07G044_SDHI0_CANFD_RSTP_N.
>
> Just rethinking by looking at R-Car approach, We may not need defining resets in dt-binding file.
>
> We can create a 16 bit unique index with register offset in the last 12bits and control bits in last 4 bits.
> Device tree passes this index and driver extracts this info for reset handling.
>
> This will avoid dt-binding dependency. Are you ok this approach for resets?? What about clock, existing method or similar 16bit index method??
>
> Please share your thoughts.

I did consider that option, too.  However, you would still need a bit
of thought/processing to convert from register offsets and bit indices
to clock/reset numbers and vice versa.
Compare this to MSTP clock numbers on R-Car (and GIC SPI IDs, and
DMA slave MID/RIDs), where you can just read the number from a table in
the Hardware User's Manual.
So I think it's easier to have a list of clock definitions in a
dt-bindings file.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux