Hi Yang,
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 11:39 AM Yang Li <yang.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Currently the function returns NULL on error, so exact error code is lost.
> This patch changes return convention of the function to use ERR_PTR()
> on error instead.
>
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/clk/renesas/renesas-rzg2l-cpg.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/renesas/renesas-rzg2l-cpg.c b/drivers/clk/renesas/renesas-rzg2l-cpg.c
> index 1fcea17..5bc7e87 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/renesas/renesas-rzg2l-cpg.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/renesas/renesas-rzg2l-cpg.c
> @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static unsigned long rzg2l_cpg_pll_clk_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> pll_clk = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pll_clk), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!pll_clk) {
> clk = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> - return NULL;
> + return clk;
> }
Why not simply "return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);"?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
