Hi Adam,
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 2:45 PM Adam Ford <aford173@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 2:08 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 12:52 PM Adam Ford <aford173@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > For devices that use a programmable clock for the AVB reference clock,
> > > the driver may need to enable them. Add code to find the optional clock
> > > and enable it when available.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Thanks for your patch!
> >
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> > > @@ -2148,6 +2148,13 @@ static int ravb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > goto out_release;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + priv->refclk = devm_clk_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "refclk");
> > > + if (IS_ERR(priv->refclk)) {
> > > + error = PTR_ERR(priv->refclk);
> > > + goto out_release;
> > > + }
> > > + clk_prepare_enable(priv->refclk);
> > > +
> >
> > Shouldn't the reference clock be disabled in case of any failure below?
> >
> I'll generate a V4.
>
> Should I just regenerate this patch since it seems like the rest are
> OK, or should I regenerate the whole series?
As the DT bindings haven't been applied yet, I think it would be
best if you would send a v4 with just the patches for the netdev
tree (i.e. DT bindings patch 1 and driver patch 4).
I will take the DT patches from this series, once the bindings have been
accepted.
Thank you!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
