Re: [PATCH v2 04/15] PCI: xilinx: Don't allocate extra memory for the MSI capture address

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 12:35:58 +0000,
Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Marc for the patch.
> > Subject: [PATCH v2 04/15] PCI: xilinx: Don't allocate extra memory for the
> > MSI capture address
> > 
> > A long cargo-culted behaviour of PCI drivers is to allocate memory to obtain
> > an address that is fed to the controller as the MSI capture address (i.e. the
> > MSI doorbell).
> > 
> > But there is no actual requirement for this address to be RAM.
> > All it needs to be is a suitable aligned address that will
> > *not* be DMA'd to.
> > 
> > Use the physical address of the 'port' data structure as the MSI capture
> > address.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c | 18 ++++++------------
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> ...
> > -	msg.address_hi = 0;
> > -	msg.address_lo = msg_addr;
> > +	msg.address_hi = upper_32_bits(msg_addr);
> > +	msg.address_lo = lower_32_bits(msg_addr);
> 
> The XILINX_PCIE_REG_MSIBASE2 register expects 4KB aligned address.
> The lower 12-bits are always set to 0 in this register. So we need
> to mask the address while programming address to

Thanks for the heads up, I'll fix this up. Does it work correctly once
the address is aligned?

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux