Hi Jacopo, Thank you for the patch. On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 06:41:34PM +0100, Jacopo Mondi wrote: > When the device is identified the driver currently reports the > names of the chips embedded in the camera module. > > Report the name of the camera module itself instead. > Cosmetic change only. > > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c b/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c > index 6504ed0bd3bc..56406d82b5ac 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c > @@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ static int rdacm20_initialize(struct rdacm20_device *dev) > if (ret) > return ret; > > - dev_info(dev->dev, "Identified MAX9271 + OV10635 device\n"); > + dev_info(dev->dev, "Identified RDACM20 camera module\n"); > > /* > * Set reverse channel high threshold to increase noise immunity. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
