Re: [PATCH 0/4] i2c: rcar: handle Gen2 and Gen3 V3U quirks better

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Wolfram,

Thanks for your series.

On 2020-12-23 18:21:50 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> The new V3U SoC needs handling of spurious interrupts which is handled
> in patch #4. However, this extra check is bad for Gen2 and earlier SoCs,
> so we need seperate interrupts now. While working on this, further
> improvements to avoid the HW race condition on Gen2 and earlier have
> been found, see patches 1-3.
> 
> My measurements have shown that patches 1+2 really improve the
> situation. Before, I could see doubled messages after adding 2us of
> delay to the interrupt handler. After, they only started to appear after
> 7us. I can't say much about the spurious interrupts on V3U. The BSP team
> experienced them, I did not so far.
> 
> Let me know what you think...

I like it, for the whole series

Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

> 
> 
> Wolfram Sang (4):
>   i2c: rcar: faster irq code to minimize HW race condition
>   i2c: rcar: optimize cacheline to minimize HW race condition
>   i2c: rcar: make sure irq is not threaded on Gen2 and earlier
>   i2c: rcar: protect against supurious interrupts on V3U
> 
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.28.0
> 

-- 
Regards,
Niklas Söderlund



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux