Hi Geert-san,
> From: Geert Uytterhoeven, Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2020 5:23 PM
<snip>
> > Or, keeping this member and then we check the product code by this member
> > instead of switch() like below?
> >
> > /* No build test, JFYI */
> > struct bd957x_data *data_array[] = {
> > &bd9571mwv_data,
> > &bd9574mwf_data,
> > };
> >
> > for (i = 0; I < ARRAY_SIZE(data_array); i++) {
> > if (val == data_array[i].product_code_val) {
> > bd->data = data_array[i];
> > break;
> > }
> > }
>
> Given we probably won't have more than a handful variants, I'm
> leaning towards the switch() approach.
OK. I got it. I'll use switch().
Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda
