Hi Prabhakar,
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 11:42 AM Lad, Prabhakar
<prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 7:11 PM Lad Prabhakar
> <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > This patch series fixes trivial issues in RPC-IF driver.
> >
> > Changes for v2:
> > * Balanced PM in rpcif_disable_rpm
> > * Fixed typo in patch 4/5
> > * Dropped C++ style fixes patch
> > * Included RB tags from Sergei
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Prabhakar
> >
> > Lad Prabhakar (5):
> > memory: renesas-rpc-if: Return correct value to the caller of
> > rpcif_manual_xfer()
> > memory: renesas-rpc-if: Fix unbalanced pm_runtime_enable in
> > rpcif_{enable,disable}_rpm
> > memory: renesas-rpc-if: Fix a reference leak in rpcif_probe()
> > memory: renesas-rpc-if: Make rpcif_enable/disable_rpm() as static
> > inline
> > memory: renesas-rpc-if: Export symbols as GPL
> >
> As these are fixes to the existing driver will these be part of v5.10 release ?
IIUIC, only the first one[*] is a fix for an issue that could happen during
normal operation?
[*] -EPROBE_DEFER would be eaten, causing no reprobe to happen.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
