Hi Jacopo, Niklas, On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 12:55 PM Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 12:47:49AM +0100, Niklas Söderlund wrote: > > This patch adds VIN{4,5}_g8 support to the R8A77951 SoC. > > Now that I've asked offline why the 'g' in the group name I see > the reason which otherwise let me search for a _g group that does not > exists in the documentation. > > Can you mention in this and other patches that the groups are 8-pins > groups on VIN4/5 [15:8] pins, named 'g' as when capturing RGB they are g8 > dedicated to the green channel ? However, that is only true for VIN4: VIN5 does not support 24-bit RGB, as it is only a 16-bit interface. Hence we need a better name than "g8" for VIN5. What about "high8" or "msb8"? Any other suggestions? The rest looks good to me, but a rebase on renesas-pinctrl wouldn't hurt ;-) Same comment for the other patches. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds