Hi Tian,
Thanks for your work.
On 2020-10-21 11:05:30 +0800, Tian Tao wrote:
> The code has been in a irq-disabled context since it is hard IRQ. There
> is no necessity to do it again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c
> index 5c2a13b..6ae757d 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c
> @@ -409,16 +409,15 @@ static irqreturn_t rcar_thermal_irq(int irq, void *data)
> {
> struct rcar_thermal_common *common = data;
> struct rcar_thermal_priv *priv;
> - unsigned long flags;
> u32 status, mask;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&common->lock, flags);
> + spin_lock(&common->lock);
>
> mask = rcar_thermal_common_read(common, INTMSK);
> status = rcar_thermal_common_read(common, STR);
> rcar_thermal_common_write(common, STR, 0x000F0F0F & mask);
>
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&common->lock, flags);
> + spin_unlock(&common->lock);
>
> status = status & ~mask;
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
Regards,
Niklas Söderlund
