Hi David, On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 2:40 AM David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:29:31 +0200 > > > This reverts commit 1838d6c62f57836639bd3d83e7855e0ee4f6defc. > > > > This commit moved the ravb_mdio_init() call (and thus the > > of_mdiobus_register() call) from the ravb_probe() to the ravb_open() > > call. This causes a regression during system resume (s2idle/s2ram), as > > new PHY devices cannot be bound while suspended. > ... > > > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > I noticed this too late, but please don't CC: stable on networking > patches. We have our own workflow as per the netdev FAQ. OK, will try to remember. I wanted to give a heads-up to stable that they've backported early a patch which turned out to have issues. > I've applied this but the inability to remove a module is an > extremely serious bug and should be fixed properly. Sure. As you stated in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-renesas-soc/20200820.165244.540878641387937530.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ that will need some rework in the MDIO subsystem... Thanks! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
