Re: [PATCH v3] i2c: sh_mobile: implement atomic transfers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Wolfram,

On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 6:06 PM Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > To make sure external conditions are satisfied, and we never deadlock:
> >
> >     if (pd->dev->power.is_suspended)
> >             return -EPERM;  /* any other suitable error code? */
> >
> > Perhaps this can even be done in the i2c core instead?
>
> Good question! My gut feeling says "i2c core", but that would need more
> research. I'd say we tackle this in a seperate patch but also for the
> next merge window. Sounds good?

Fine for me, it's already late in the v5.9-rc cycle.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux