Hi Wolfram,
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 11:04 AM Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> There is no case (and none forseen) where we would need to disable the
foreseen
> SDn clock. So, for simplicity, remove its handling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> One paradigm is to stay minimal and remove unneeded things. Another one
> is to not change working code unnecessarily. I favor the first one a bit
> more, but would understand arguing with the second one.
Indeed.
Does this make the code rely on bootloader setup or reset state?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
