Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] media: v4l2-async: Log message in case of heterogenous fwnode match

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jacopo,

On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 03:03:26PM +0100, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 02:25:06AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > When a notifier supplies a device fwnode and a subdev supplies an
> > endpoint fwnode, incorrect matches may occur if multiple subdevs
> > correspond to the same device fwnode. This can't be handled
> > transparently in the framework, and requires the notifier to switch to
> > endpoint fwnodes. Log a message to notify of this problem. A second
> > message is added to help accelerating the transition to endpoint
> > matching.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
> > index 224b39a7aeb1..9f393a7be455 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
> > @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ static bool match_fwnode(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
> >  	struct fwnode_handle *dev_fwnode;
> >  	bool asd_fwnode_is_ep;
> >  	bool sd_fwnode_is_ep;
> > +	struct device *dev;
> >  	const char *name;
> >
> >  	/*
> > @@ -113,7 +114,28 @@ static bool match_fwnode(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
> >
> >  	fwnode_handle_put(dev_fwnode);
> >
> > -	return dev_fwnode == other_fwnode;
> > +	if (dev_fwnode != other_fwnode)
> > +		return false;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * We have an heterogenous match. Retrieve the struct device of the
> > +	 * side that matched on a device fwnode to print its driver name.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (sd_fwnode_is_ep)
> > +		dev = notifier->v4l2_dev ? notifier->v4l2_dev->dev
> > +		    : notifier->sd->dev;
> 
> Have you considered passing the device directly ? seems notifier is
> only used for that...

Yes, but I thought that match functions could use the notifier for other
purposes in the future, so I think this approach is more versatile.

> Apart this small nit, for the series
> Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> > +	else
> > +		dev = sd->dev;
> > +
> > +	if (dev && dev->driver) {
> > +		if (sd_fwnode_is_ep)
> > +			dev_info(dev, "Driver %s uses device fwnode, incorrect match may occur\n",
> > +				 dev->driver->name);
> > +		dev_info(dev, "Consider updating driver %s to match on endpoints\n",
> > +			 dev->driver->name);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return true;
> >  }
> >
> >  static bool match_custom(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux